Why do you think the Supreme Court ruled this way?

The Supreme Court said in the Vinson case that voluntary relationships may still be “unwelcome” and therefore may constitute sexual harassment. Why do you think the Supreme Court ruled this way? What is unique about the relationship between a supervisor and an employee? Do you think a voluntary relationship between an employee and another (non-supervisory) employee may still be “unwelcome”?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *