Website/blog marking guide

EDUC1015/EC101 assessment 2: Website/blog marking guide (100 marks): Value 50%

Very poor Poor Satisfactory Good Very good Outstanding
Written summation:
Knowledge of topic
10 marks
Some content but no
evidence of understanding of
the topic
Very limited understanding
of the topic
Emerging but satisfactory
understanding of the topic that
was formulaic and/or lacked an
appreciation of its wider
implications
Good critical understanding of
the topic & aspects of its wider
implications
Very good critical
understanding of the topic &
appreciation of its wider
implications
Outstanding, insightful and
highly developed critical
understanding of the topic &
appreciation of its wider
implications
Auditory summation:
Knowledge of topic
10 marks
Some content but no
evidence of understanding of
the topic
Very limited understanding
of the topic
Emerging but satisfactory
understanding of the topic that
was formulaic and/or lacked an
appreciation of its wider
implications
Good critical understanding of
the topic & aspects of its wider
implications
Very good critical
understanding of the topic &
appreciation of its wider
implications
Outstanding, insightful and
highly developed critical
understanding of the topic &
appreciation of its wider
implications
Visual Summation:
Knowledge of topic
10 marks
Some content but no
evidence of understanding of
the topic
Very limited understanding
of the topic
Emerging but satisfactory
understanding of the topic that
was formulaic and/or lacked an
appreciation of its wider
implications
Good critical understanding of
the topic & aspects of its wider
implications
Very good critical
understanding of the topic &
appreciation of its wider
implications
Outstanding, insightful and
highly developed critical
understanding of the topic &
appreciation of its wider
implications
Final reflection:
Reflective thinking: learning as
a result of experience
Critical thinking: clear
reasoned judgements
10 marks
No final reflection Very poor personal
reflection on developing the
website/blog that does not
evaluate the process.
Primarily a summary of their
actions.
Personal reflection on the
process of developing the
website/ blog but little
evaluation of this process
Critical personal reflection that
evaluates the process of
developing the website/blog
and justifies the choices made
in development
Critical personal reflection that
clearly evaluates the process of
developing the website/blog
and justifies well the choices
made in development
Outstanding, insightful and
critical personal reflection that
clearly evaluates the process of
developing the website/blog
and justifies very well the
choices made in development
Final reflection:
Links to teaching and learning
20 marks
No connection to teaching
and learning
Little if any connection to
teaching and learning
Some connections to teaching
and learning, but ideas were
limited and not fully reasoned
Good connections to teaching
and learning and these
connections were justified
Very good and clear
connections to teaching and
learning and these connections
were well justified through
links to literature
Outstanding, clear and
insightful connections to
teaching and learning and
these connections were very
well justified through links to
the literature
Creativity and design
(overall)
Creative: uses tools in an
innovative and worthwhile
way
10 marks
Demonstrated no awareness
of design choices, and did
not demonstrate creativity
Demonstrated little
awareness of design choices,
and made very few creative
choices regarding the
website/blog
Demonstrated developing
awareness of design choices,
and made some creative
choices regarding the website/
blog
Demonstrated good awareness
of design choices, and made a
good attempt to make a
creative website/blog
Demonstrated a very good
awareness of design choices,
and successfully made a
creative website/blog
Demonstrated an outstanding
awareness of design choices,
and made a highly successful,
creative and original
website/blog
Technical elements (overall)
(external, links, navigation,
theme customisation, menus,
widgets, etc)
10 marks
Broken links and/or poor
navigation. No use of
features available in tool
Many broken links and/or
navigation problems. Very
limited use of features
available in tool
A few broken links but
navigation working.
Satisfactory use of the features
available in the tool
All links and navigation
working and well designed.
Good use of the features of the
chosen tool
All links and navigation
working and well designed.
Very good use of the features
of the chosen tool to enhance
the user experience and overall
appeal. All technical
requirements adhered to
All links and navigation
working and well designed.
Outstanding use of the features
of the chosen tool to greatly
enhance the user experience
and overall appeal. All
technical requirements adhered
to
Academic writing
10 marks
Very poor or indecipherable
writing skills
Poor writing skills in
grammar, spelling, syntax,
paragraphing, general
language skills
A number of language errors
made throughout and/or a poor
level of academic writing
Some language errors, but a
good demonstration of
emerging academic writing
skills
Few language errors and a very
good demonstration of
academic writing skills
Error-free language and an
excellent demonstration of
academic writing skills
APA style referencing
10 marks
No referencing Incomplete referencing with
no demonstrated attempt at
APA 6th edition formatting.
Complete text-based
referencing but inconsistent in
terms of APA 6th edition
formatting
Complete text-and image
based referencing but
inconsistent in terms of APA
6th edition formatting
Complete (all elements)
referencing but with some
minor errors in terms of APA
6th edition formatting
Complete (all elements)
referencing in accurate APA
6th edition formatting

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *