vould simple ,mswel and their products

kCiot Is the At,tvi)rs attitt;de Uhl exampliv, that ro;cal flow lit- tech ,,,„„ 5
Note: the following essay is a No Sweat?:
When I began investigating the Ilse I thought there ‘vould simple ,mswel and their products should he host otted consumers. As I looked more (kepis: into w prising and perplexing information that hAt Mbut less convinced than before My researt.h revealf complex issue, full of complications that wahe 0 a w. my journey, I Ultimately found that There is no °right “do or do not do” solution to this dilemma and thin Lair ethical consumers is difficult to deternmie. Although this realization cm lead consumers to feel frustrated, helpless, and eventually indifferent. thee are effective actions we GM take, I began my research believing that sweatshops were unethical !he tion of a sweatshop confirmed my conviction According to ethics and researchers Denis Arnold and Laura I ianman, a sweatshop is … any working environment in which the wi)rkers arc subie(1 h) two or more of the following conditions: overtime, coercion, or u (mp oyer negligence; systematic forad systematic health and safety risks caused t) ess thin the — n( erPaYment, or income for a 48.hour work week that 1 survival needs. (2) amount needed to satisfy basic Stories of such condisfrcs, iairdet earning tizbekistan, a wage of 38 thousand f cents Or onimon in the media. For examr,le:i rhecenirm_ust pick 10 to 40 kg of cotton Pe. efforts, I a 1 ..e caLikiren cam

No Sweat?’ by Ruhi Garyfalaids. (i)Nelson Education I ‘finite&