INT102 Assessment 1B Written Report Marking Criteria
| REPORT CRITERIA |
Weight | F 0 – 49% |
P 50 – 59% |
C 60 – 69% |
D 70 – 79% |
HD 80 > |
| Presentation | 10 | No coversheet. Formatting guidelines not followed. |
Coversheet present with missing details. Formatting guidelines observed but not in full. |
Completed coversheet. Most formatting guidelines observed. |
Correctly completed coversheet including word count. Formatting guidelines observed with minor inconsistencies. |
Correctly completed coversheet with all required information provided. Fully observes formatting guidelines. |
| Academic Writing |
20 | Poor word choice; Poor syntax; Incorrect/poor use of language. |
Satisfactory attempt in academic writing; Syntax and structure evident but with multiple errors. |
Correct written expression; Good syntax and structure of assessment with some errors. |
Clear, concise and correct writing; Very good syntax and structure of assessment with few errors. |
Sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness of writing; Excellent written expression. |
| Introduction | 10 | Introduction absent, poorly written or not related to the topic. |
Mentions topic. | Covers topic. | Covers topic; Provides direction for assessment. |
Covers topic clearly; Provides context & direction of assessment. |
| Discussion | 30 | Little to no stated description of barriers; Poor understanding of requirements for working with chosen client group or case study. Little to no identification of resources that assist communication. |
Very little stated description of barriers; Some understanding of requirements for working with chosen client group or case study. Very little identification of resources that assist with communication. |
Good and clearly stated description of barriers; Good understanding of requirements for working with chosen client group or case study. Good identification of resources that assist with communication. |
Very good and clearly stated description of barriers; clear understanding of requirements for working with chosen client group and case study. Very good Identification of resources that assist with communication. |
Excellent and clearly stated description of barriers; in-depth understanding of requirements for working with chosen client group and case study. Excellent identification of resources that assist with communication. |
| Conclusion | 10 | No summary or conclusion. | Poor summary and conclusion | Good summary and conclusion. | Very good summary and conclusion; attempt at integration of personal learning. |
Excellent summary and conclusion; integration of personal learning. |
| Research | 10 | No evidence of research. | References scarcely used; Weak, outdated or inappropriate external sources used. |
References cited; Attempt at using credible academic sources. |
References used well; Current, peer reviewed academic sources used effectively. |
References used effectively; Credible, peer reviewed & current academic sources used effectively and extensively to support discussion; use of text book. |
| Referencing | 10 | No in-text referencing; Reference List absent or poorly presented; APA 7 not used or poorly observed. |
Attempt made at in-text referencing; Reference List has errors; APA 7 guidelines observed but not in full. |
In-text references cited; Reference List has some errors; APA 7 guidelines observed to some extent. |
In-text references cited with few errors; Reference list presented with few errors; APA 7 observed well. |
In-text references correctly cited; Reference list presented with no errors; APA 7 guidelines observed fully. |
| TOTAL | /20% |