Analysis of two elements of an artifact that challenged your thinking (1) (1)
| Analysis of two elements of an artifact that challenged your thinking (1) (1) | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – description |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Statement that challenged your thinking is clearly
and thoroughly described
4.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Statement that challenged your thinking is somewhat
clearly and thoroughly described
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Statement that challenged your thinking is poorly
described
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Statement that challenged your thinking is not
described
| 5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – location |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading
is specifically indicated, including page number(s)
4.0 pts
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading
is indicated, but difficult to find
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading
not indicated
| 5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – How did it challenge your thinking? |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Clear and thorough description of how the item
challenged your thinking, including a description of your
previously-held belief
4.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Solid description of how the item challenged your
thinking, including a description of your previously-held
belief
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Vague description of how the item challenged your
thinking, or poor description of your previously-held belief
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Very poor description of how the item challenged
your thinking, and very poor description of your
previously-held belief
| 5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – verification of information |
15.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Clear and convincing argument for/against the
challenging thought, including an indication of how strongly
you believe in the results.
12.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Clear or convincing argument for/against the
challenging thought, including an indication of how strongly
you believe in the results.
10.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Solid, but unconvincing argument for/against the
challenging thought, possibly including an indication of how
strongly you believe in the results.
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Extremely poor or non-existent argument for/against
the challenging thought.
| 15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – analysis of information source |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Extremely clear and thorough explanations of the
reliability of information source is provided.
4.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Clear and thorough explanations of the reliability
of information source is provided.
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Explanations of the reliability of information
source is provided, but lacks some clarity and/or
thoroughness.
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Source analysis is not present
| 5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – description |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Statement that challenged your thinking is clearly
and thoroughly described
4.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Statement that challenged your thinking is somewhat
clearly and thoroughly described
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Statement that challenged your thinking is poorly
described
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Statement that challenged your thinking is not
described
| 5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – location |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading
is specifically indicated, including page number(s)
4.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading
is indicated, but difficult to find
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading
not indicated
| 5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – How did it challenge your thinking? |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Clear and thorough description of how the item
challenged your thinking, including a description of your
previously-held belief
4.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Solid description of how the item challenged your
thinking, including a description of your previously-held
belief
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Vague description of how the item challenged your
thinking, or poor description of your previously-held belief
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Very poor description of how the item challenged
your thinking, and very poor description of your
previously-held belief
| 5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – verification of information |
15.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Clear and convincing argument for/against the
challenging thought, including an indication of how strongly
you believe in the results.
12.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Clear or convincing argument for/against the
challenging thought, including an indication of how strongly
you believe in the results.
10.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Solid, but unconvincing argument for/against the
challenging thought, possibly including an indication of how
strongly you believe in the results.
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Extremely poor or non-existent argument for/against
the challenging thought.
| 15.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – analysis of information source |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Extremely clear and thorough explanations of the
reliability of information source is provided.
4.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Clear and thorough explanations of the reliability
of information source is provided.
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Explanations of the reliability of information
source is provided, but lacks some clarity and/or
thoroughness.
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Source analysis is not present
| 5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources cited |
10.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – If outside sources are used, they are cited in such
a way that others can readily find the source. If no outside
sources are used, full credit is received.
8.0 pts
7.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – If outside sources are used, they are cited, but NOT
in such a way that others can readily find the source.
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Outside sources are not cited.
| 10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization |
10.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Answer is extremely well-organized and easy to
follow.
8.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Answer is well-organized and easy to follow.
7.0 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Answer is moderately well-organized and somewhat
difficult to follow.
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Answer is very poorly organized and extremely
difficult to follow.
| 10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and professionalism |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – Grammar and spelling are perfect, the language is
appropriate, and the writing style is clear and readable.
Terminology from the lesson and/or course is used (if
relevant), and used correctly.
4.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – Very few minor grammar/spelling mistakes, the
language is appropriate, and the writing style is readable.
Terminology from the lesson and/or course is used (if
relevant), and used correctly.
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – Minor grammar/spelling errors are present and the
language is appropriate. Writing style is acceptable, but the
argument is somewhat unclear. Use of course terminology is not
entirely appropriate.
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – Unclear, unedited, very difficult to read.
| 5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength |
5.0 pts
Achievement
Level 1 – The answer is concise, to the point, and avoids
unnecessary wordiness. All words/explanations are entirely
relevant to the task at hand.
4.0 pts
Achievement
Level 2 – The answer is concise and almost entirely to the
point, but somewhat wordy.
3.5 pts
Achievement
Level 3 – The answer contains unnecessary analysis, but most
words and explanations are relevant.
0.0 pts
Achievement
Level 5 – The answer is rambling and contains very little to
no content that addresses the task at hand.
| 5.0 pts |
| Total Points: 100.0 |
PreviousNext