Analysis of two elements of an artifact

Analysis of two elements of an artifact that challenged your thinking (1) (1)

Analysis of two elements of an artifact that challenged your thinking (1) (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – description 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Statement that challenged your thinking is clearly and thoroughly described 4.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Statement that challenged your thinking is somewhat clearly and thoroughly described 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Statement that challenged your thinking is poorly described 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Statement that challenged your thinking is not described
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – location 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading is specifically indicated, including page number(s) 4.0 pts 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading is indicated, but difficult to find 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading not indicated
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – How did it challenge your thinking? 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Clear and thorough description of how the item challenged your thinking, including a description of your previously-held belief 4.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Solid description of how the item challenged your thinking, including a description of your previously-held belief 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Vague description of how the item challenged your thinking, or poor description of your previously-held belief 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Very poor description of how the item challenged your thinking, and very poor description of your previously-held belief
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – verification of information 15.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Clear and convincing argument for/against the challenging thought, including an indication of how strongly you believe in the results. 12.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Clear or convincing argument for/against the challenging thought, including an indication of how strongly you believe in the results. 10.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Solid, but unconvincing argument for/against the challenging thought, possibly including an indication of how strongly you believe in the results. 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Extremely poor or non-existent argument for/against the challenging thought.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst challenging thought – analysis of information source 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Extremely clear and thorough explanations of the reliability of information source is provided. 4.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Clear and thorough explanations of the reliability of information source is provided. 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Explanations of the reliability of information source is provided, but lacks some clarity and/or thoroughness. 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Source analysis is not present
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – description 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Statement that challenged your thinking is clearly and thoroughly described 4.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Statement that challenged your thinking is somewhat clearly and thoroughly described 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Statement that challenged your thinking is poorly described 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Statement that challenged your thinking is not described
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – location 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading is specifically indicated, including page number(s) 4.0 pts Achievement Level 2 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading is indicated, but difficult to find 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Location of the challenging thought in the reading not indicated
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – How did it challenge your thinking? 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Clear and thorough description of how the item challenged your thinking, including a description of your previously-held belief 4.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Solid description of how the item challenged your thinking, including a description of your previously-held belief 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Vague description of how the item challenged your thinking, or poor description of your previously-held belief 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Very poor description of how the item challenged your thinking, and very poor description of your previously-held belief
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – verification of information 15.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Clear and convincing argument for/against the challenging thought, including an indication of how strongly you believe in the results. 12.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Clear or convincing argument for/against the challenging thought, including an indication of how strongly you believe in the results. 10.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Solid, but unconvincing argument for/against the challenging thought, possibly including an indication of how strongly you believe in the results. 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Extremely poor or non-existent argument for/against the challenging thought.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond challenging thought – analysis of information source 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Extremely clear and thorough explanations of the reliability of information source is provided. 4.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Clear and thorough explanations of the reliability of information source is provided. 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Explanations of the reliability of information source is provided, but lacks some clarity and/or thoroughness. 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Source analysis is not present
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources cited 10.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – If outside sources are used, they are cited in such a way that others can readily find the source. If no outside sources are used, full credit is received. 8.0 pts 7.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – If outside sources are used, they are cited, but NOT in such a way that others can readily find the source. 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Outside sources are not cited.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 10.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Answer is extremely well-organized and easy to follow. 8.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Answer is well-organized and easy to follow. 7.0 pts Achievement Level 3 – Answer is moderately well-organized and somewhat difficult to follow. 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Answer is very poorly organized and extremely difficult to follow.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and professionalism 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – Grammar and spelling are perfect, the language is appropriate, and the writing style is clear and readable. Terminology from the lesson and/or course is used (if relevant), and used correctly. 4.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – Very few minor grammar/spelling mistakes, the language is appropriate, and the writing style is readable. Terminology from the lesson and/or course is used (if relevant), and used correctly. 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – Minor grammar/spelling errors are present and the language is appropriate. Writing style is acceptable, but the argument is somewhat unclear. Use of course terminology is not entirely appropriate. 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – Unclear, unedited, very difficult to read.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength 5.0 pts Achievement Level 1 – The answer is concise, to the point, and avoids unnecessary wordiness. All words/explanations are entirely relevant to the task at hand. 4.0 pts Achievement Level 2 – The answer is concise and almost entirely to the point, but somewhat wordy. 3.5 pts Achievement Level 3 – The answer contains unnecessary analysis, but most words and explanations are relevant. 0.0 pts Achievement Level 5 – The answer is rambling and contains very little to no content that addresses the task at hand.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.